The New York state assembly has passed a bill authorizing no-fault divorce in New York. Governor David Patterson signed the bill on August 15; it goes into effect on October 12, 2010.

The provision is an amendment to Domestic Relations Law (DRL) Section 170, and states that, as one of the grounds for divorce in the State of New York, a new ground for divorce shall be that:

(7) The relationship  between  husband  and  wife  has  broken  down irretrievably  for  a  period  of at least six months, provided that one party has so stated under oath. No judgment of divorce shall be granted under this subdivision unless and until the economic issues of equitable distribution  of  marital  property,  the  payment  or waiver of spousal  support, the payment of  child  support,  the  payment  of  counsel  and experts’  fees  and  expenses as well as the custody and visitation with the infant children of the marriage have been resolved by  the  parties, or  determined  by  the  court  and  incorporated  into  the judgment of  divorce.

What this provision means is that you will no longer have to accuse your spouse of refusing to engage in sexual relations, or neither admit nor deny that accusation if it is made against you. Fault is no longer an issue. In the real world of New York divorce the grounds for divorce were rarely an issue anyway. This simply takes the issue off the table. It was one of the few bargaining chips that a reluctant-to-divorce spouse had to seek a more generous financial settlement; that is now gone. If either of you wants out, you are getting divorced.

However, the Court cannot grant a divorce until all other issues, including custody and support of children, support of a spouse, distribution of all assets, and so forth, have all been settled. So, the real issues are still there.

Now that grounds are no longer an issue, there is no reason whatsoever to engage in litigation. All the outstanding issues can be much more easily settled, and at a fraction of the cost, through mediation.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Failure to Deal with Realities in Divorce, Part 2

May 13, 2010

Obviously, the husband could have been presenting a partial picture; I told him that his initial failure to provide financial disclosure to his wife’s attorney had probably cost him some creditability. The following week the husband turned  up for our next appointment. We waited half an hour for the wife; he tried calling her — [...]

Read the full article →